The web3 ecosystem thrives because of creators and their communities. For creators, NFTs provide an opportunity to meaningfully share and monetize their content in a new and exciting way. For their communities, NFTs are a way of showing support for creators while building a sense of community with fellow token holders.

At OpenSea, we recognize the efforts that original creators put into their work and want to help make sure other works don’t cause confusion or detract from the original. We consider an NFT a 'copymint' if it was created with the intent to deceive users into thinking it’s the original. If we believe an NFT is a copymint, OpenSea users won’t be able to view it, and we’ll work to delist collections and disable accounts with repeated copymint violations (this procedure exists in addition to OpenSea’s existing DMCA procedure, which allows individuals to notify OpenSea if they believe an NFT infringes on their copyrighted work). This is done through a combination of image detection technology and human review. “Delisting” these items does not remove them from the blockchain, just from OpenSea.

Going forward, we may consider an item to be a copymint if it has one or more of the following characteristics:

A pixel-for-pixel replica (exact match of an original collection)
A replica that is flipped, rotated, or facing the opposite direction
A replica that is resized, zoomed in or out, cropped, or repositioned
A replica with added or removed borders and edges
A replica with unintegrated texts, logos, or emojis, either typed or drawn
A replica that only swaps the background color
A replica with colors swapped, modified, or saturated (for example, colors have been brightened or darkened, including black and white versions of the original)
A pixelated version of the original artwork

The goal of this policy is not to tamp down on inspiration. We recognize that popular collections are often a source of inspiration, and we want to provide space for creators to contribute “remixes” of the original work. In many cases, these remixes help create ecosystems around a given collection, and many creators aspire to build collections that take on a creative ecosystem of their own. There is an important—but nuanced—difference between a remix and a copymint.

To fall outside of the copymint definition, there must be multiple, substantial changes to an existing NFT. And even if OpenSea considers the newer work to be a remix, the copyright holder still may file a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) legal request on the grounds that it violates their copyright. We cannot provide legal advice about whether a particular NFT or collection violates a copyright.

We aren’t art critics and our copymint policy isn’t about labeling “good” or “bad” art. Instead, our copymint policy seeks to help reduce instances of the community seeing NFTs that aim to confuse and deceive collectors into purchasing these copymint NFTs. After reviewing thousands of examples, we’ve identified the eight characteristics above as common potential causes of confusion, and thus effective ways to identify a copymint. This list is not exhaustive and may evolve along as the NFT ecosystem evolves.

FAQs

How many substantial changes are needed for something to be considered a remix?

We do not publicize our internal guidelines for the minimum number of changes. We encourage creators to make as many changes as possible to clear up any confusion.

If something is clearly a parody or satire of the original will it be considered a copymint?

If the NFT includes text or images used to distinguish itself from the original, it will be a factor in determining whether it is a copymint.

How does this program interact with OpenSea’s existing DMCA takedown procedures?

This program exists in addition to OpenSea’s existing DMCA takedown procedures. If a rights holder believes that an NFT infringes on their copyright, they can use the DMCA procedure.

How can my collection be taken down if it’s considered a remix by OpenSea?

Ultimately, it’s up to the copyright holder to make a determination on whether they believe an NFT or collection infringes on their intellectual property.

Real fans will be able to tell the difference, so why is this copymint policy necessary?

To foster an inclusive web3 ecosystem, it’s important that we provide signals to reduce confusion for users, such as verified accounts. Our copymint enforcement is one of many tools we’re using to enhance the user experience.

Is it considered a copymint if I mix up existing properties from a collection?

Putting existing properties together in a different way is a factor in determining whether something is a copymint.

A certain collection seems to fall within your copymint definition, so why hasn’t it been delisted?

There are a few potential reasons. First, our systems may still be detecting and evaluating the underlying content and could action it soon. Second, we may be taking a closer look at the collection with human reviewers to make a determination. Third, we are also working to refine and improve our technology—so it may be that our systems haven’t been able to detect the content yet.

Copymint examples

1. A pixel-for-pixel replica (exact match)

2. A replica that is flipped, rotated, or facing the opposite direction

3. A replica that is resized, zoomed in or out, cropped, or repositioned

4. A replica with added or removed borders and edges

5. A replica with unintegrated texts, logos, or emojis, either typed or drawn

6. A replica that only swaps the background color

7. A replica with colors swapped, modified, or saturated (for example, colors have been brightened or darkened, including black and white versions of the original)

8. A pixelated version of the original artwork